Signup
Welcome to... Canonfire! World of GreyhawK
Features
Postcards from the Flanaess
Adventures
in Greyhawk
Cities of
Oerth
Deadly
Denizens
Jason Zavoda Presents
The Gord Novels
Greyhawk Wiki
Canonfire :: View topic - Enchantment/Charm Penalties to Unconscious/Sleeping Targets?
Canonfire Forum Index -> Greyhawk- AD&D 2nd Edition
Enchantment/Charm Penalties to Unconscious/Sleeping Targets?
Author Message
GreySage

Joined: Sep 09, 2009
Posts: 2470
From: SW WA state (Highvale)

Send private message
Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:05 am  
Enchantment/Charm Penalties to Unconscious/Sleeping Targets?

A new question:

Do unconscious or sleeping victims accrue a saving throw penalty to enchantment/charm spells that affect the mind (such as Charm Person or Monster and the like)?

It comes down to this: is the victim's unconscious mind 'strong' or 'alert' enough to resist the effects of these spells to avoid a saving throw penalty, or does it require an active or conscious mind?

If a saving throw penalty is leveled, what is the rating?

-Lanthorn, the Active Inquisitor
Journeyman Greytalker

Joined: Feb 12, 2014
Posts: 174
From: Maryland, USA

Send private message
Sun Jan 24, 2016 8:19 pm  

There's no active resistance, so if the spell specifies the creature must actively resist it, or has a bonus/penalty based on actively resisting, then that applies. If the spell just has a saving throw with no modifiers, then being unconscious has no effect. An unconscious character might not be aware of being targeted of such a spell if the description indicates they might notice if the saving throw is successful. I don't see any reason the Charm spells would be more likely to affect a sleeping character, though.

Jeff
GreySage

Joined: Jul 26, 2010
Posts: 2752
From: LG Dyvers

Send private message
Mon Jan 25, 2016 3:40 am  

I say that you may make a special determination, as the DM, based upon the PC's personality and alignment.

I say that because I know of many instances in my own dreams wherein I specifically refused to act in a certain manner because it was contrary to my nature and moral character to act that way in real life. Usually, such situations in my dreams would wake me, but not always. I would just remember the instance after waking and marvel that, even in my dreams, I wouldn't act that way.

So, take that anecdotal evidence as you will and see if it adds spice to your game.

SirXaris
_________________
SirXaris' Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/SirXaris?ref=hl
Black Hand of Oblivion

Joined: Feb 16, 2003
Posts: 3836
From: So. Cal

Send private message
Tue Jan 26, 2016 2:37 am  

Regular saving throw.
_________________
- Moderator/Admin (in some areas)/Member -
GreySage

Joined: Sep 09, 2009
Posts: 2470
From: SW WA state (Highvale)

Send private message
Sun Jan 31, 2016 8:17 am  

Cebrion wrote:
Regular saving throw.


Works for me. Appreciate the input.

-Lanthorn
Journeyman Greytalker

Joined: Mar 05, 2007
Posts: 290
From: The Pomarj

Send private message
Sun Jan 31, 2016 11:05 am  

So, what are people's opinions regarding magic resistance in this situation? After all, elves do have the innate resistance to charm type spells.

My thought on this is, the resistance would still apply. My understanding of how magic resistance works is that it is there unless the character willingly drops it.
GreySage

Joined: Sep 09, 2009
Posts: 2470
From: SW WA state (Highvale)

Send private message
Sun Jan 31, 2016 11:51 am  

Magic resistance always applies unless the creature willingly surrenders that innate ability.

-Lanthorn
Apprentice Greytalker

Joined: Apr 21, 2016
Posts: 9


Send private message
Thu May 05, 2016 1:42 pm  

Attacks vs sleeping or held characters automatic hits. Spells too. MR does kick in though as this is innate.
Journeyman Greytalker

Joined: Feb 12, 2014
Posts: 174
From: Maryland, USA

Send private message
Thu May 05, 2016 4:16 pm  

Rom wrote:
Attacks vs sleeping or held characters automatic hits. Spells too. MR does kick in though as this is innate.


If the spell only requires an attack roll (i.e. shocking grasp, cause light wounds, etc.), then yes, it is automatic. If it requires failing a saving throw (even failing a saving throw for half damage) to take effect, then no, it isn't automatic. You have to intentionally voluntarily fail a saving throw for a spell to automatically take effect, and you can't voluntarily fail a saving throw while asleep or held.

Jeff
Display posts from previous:   
   Canonfire Forum Index -> Greyhawk- AD&D 2nd Edition All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Canonfire! is a production of the Thursday Group in assocation with GREYtalk and Canonfire! Enterprises

Contact the Webmaster.  Long Live Spidasa!


Greyhawk Gothic Font by Darlene Pekul is used under the Creative Commons License.

PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.
Page Generation: 1.41 Seconds